Even
as early as an early teen, it fascinated me the explanation at the end
of an article, signed by a name then followed by 'writer and
journalist'. With the passing of years, this fascination continues
because every article you ever read in any media always ends with such
and such a 'name', then 'writer and journalist'. 'David Jones, writer
and journalist', 'John Smith, writer and journalist.' I find this as
ridiculous as putting 'Rafael Nadal, sportsman and tennis player', or 'Obama, politician and president'.
I
always put this superfluous monotony down to little consideration and
respect to the journalist to dignify him, almost like saying 'He is
journalist, poor man, but he is okay, he can write.'. I wonder whether
it's result of the indifference of the journalists themselves, that it
matters not to them if it's a full-stop, or a comma, this adjective or
better the other. Nobody ever questions it. I have never seen any other
professionals that care so little about their profession.
What
is more surprising, for me anyway, not only is this absurdity not
abating, it propagates more by the day. A few days ago I walked past
through the main street in Darnius. On the front of a house, No. 38 of
that street, there's a plaque, in which it says 'In this house was born
Jose Maria Gironella, writer and novelist'. Same nonsense, this time
applies to a novelist. Of course he is both. Isn't that obvious? Would
eliminating the superfluous word 'writer' make him less of one?
Not
too many things in the world are clear and precise, but I dare presume
all novelists are writers, same as all pianists are musicians, and all
water-colour artists are painters. Why the idiotic addition then? Later I
took a look at the News online, Tribuna.cat, and saw an article -
Senlit de Pais - signed by Cesc Serrahima, writer and poet. That's all I
need to see for one day! Are there poets who are not writers?
I do realize there are exceptions. These days there are male who are not men, or female who are not women. Aren't there?